[AI]LABS · INTELLIGENCE DIVISION DOSSIER № ROI-APOLLO-02
SUBJECT: Apollo Heating & Cooling Inc. SECTOR: Residential HVAC LOCALE: Wentzville, MO STATUS: Acquisition target

The packet was wrong.
Here is the verified one.

A field re-verification of Apollo Heating & Cooling — built from primary sources, adversarially checked, and corrected. This revision supersedes the prior automated report in full.

⟁ Revision 02 · Supersedes Rev. 01 ✓ Independently re-verified Compiled 08 JUN 2026
00 — CORRECTIONS LEDGER · READ FIRST

Two errors, pointing opposite ways.

The prior automated packet failed in both directions — and both failures trace to the same broken tooling.

◤ Error 1 — Overstated the void

It scored Social Presence 1/10 and declared “zero presence on every major platform, no Google Business Profile, total greenfield.” False. Apollo runs an active Facebook page, a live Google Business Profile with ~42 reviews, BBB A+, and Angi 5.0.

◢ Error 2 — Understated the real gap

On the metric that actually drives HVAC leads — Google review volume & rating — Apollo (~42 reviews, 4.0★) is not “#3 behind two players.” It is a small operator with the lowest star-rating in its local peer set, where rivals sit at 4.9★ with hundreds-to-thousands of reviews.

The accurate thesis is not “greenfield — build from zero.” It is a 35-year, 2nd-generation, A+/Carrier-authorized incumbent that is genuinely under-marketed and carries a mediocre 4.0★ rating — i.e. “modernize, fix the rating, amplify.”
VOID METHODOLOGY & INTEGRITY NOTE

Why the first packet was wrong — root cause.

On re-run, three of the marketing tools that fed the original report are returning false negatives: audit_social_media reports “not found” for every platform (including Facebook and Google, which provably exist); research_reputation and research_local return zero results. The “1/10 greenfield” headline is a tooling artifact, not reality — and the defect is not Apollo-specific.

Everything in this revision was re-built from primary sources (the company’s own site, Google Maps place data, BBB, Birdeye JSON-LD, LinkedIn, Yelp) and adversarially verified. PageSpeed & SEMrush figures are retained from our own live tools and labeled as such; anything we could not confirm is marked unverified.

01 — SOCIAL PRESENCE

Social Presence

1/104/10

Real, but narrow. One modest active channel plus a Google profile doing the reputation work. Not zero — and not robust.

Platform-by-platform · verified status
PlatformStatusVerified detailConf.
FacebookActivefacebook.com/apollohvac245 likes/followers, “since 1990.” Confirmed via live og:title.High 96%
Google BusinessLiveReal Maps place (CID 0xbb669a29c4a5fbeb, geocodes to 120 Hwy A). ~42 reviews / 4.0★ — see §02.High 90%
InstagramAbsentNo profile across multiple targeted queries.Med 75%
LinkedInOwner onlyNo company page. Owner Tom Keppler has a personal profile (/in/tomkeppler). The “Apollo Heating and Cooling Inc” company page is the Saint Clair Shores, MI namesake — not them.Med 80%
YouTube / TikTok / XAbsentNo accounts for the Wentzville entity.Med 65%

Net: Facebook (245 followers) + a Google profile that functions as the de-facto reputation hub. No Instagram, no company LinkedIn, no video. Narrow and largely inactive — not the “1/10 nonexistent” the original claimed.

02 — REVIEWS & REPUTATION

Reviews & Reputation

folded into “1/10”5/10

Sentiment is positive in absolute terms — but the 4.0★ Google rating is the lowest in the local peer set (rivals at 4.9–5.0), and review velocity looks low. For HVAC, the Google rating is the lead engine, so this reads as a relative weakness, not the strong asset a first pass implied.

Review surfaces · verified
SourceValueConf.
Google~42 reviews · 4.0★ — one aggregator shows 32 @ 4.03; treat count as a 32–42 range, rating 4.0 firm.Med–Hi
Birdeye4.0★ / 43 total = 42 Google + 1 Insider Pages (dated 2005). Verified in raw JSON-LD.High 97%
BBBA+, Accredited since 8/31/2010. Complaint history not retrievable (bot-walled).High 90%
Angi5.0 overall (review count unverified).Med 80%
BestProsInTown27 reviews / 13 photos — newest June 2020.High 90%
YelpListing exists; rating + count unverified (JS-walled).Med
⚑ Velocity caveat The only datable third-party reviews found are 2020 and 2005. Current Google review recency was not directly read — the “low velocity” read rests on absence of evidence. Verify the newest Google review date live before the meeting.
03 — COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

The gap the first report missed.

The original packet left this section unquantified. Here it is. On review footprint and star rating, Apollo sits in the small-operator tier — comparable to Wooding (43 reviews), an order of magnitude behind the metro leaders, and lowest-rated of the set.

Local / metro HVAC competitors · review footprint (primary surface)
CompanyReviewsRatingRead
Jerry Kelly St. Peters7,2754.9★Dominant. HVAC + electrical + plumbing; vast digital footprint.
AAA Home Services serves Wentzville8,000+4.9★Largest metro player by review volume.
Air Comfort Service Hazelwood, est. 1969“hundreds”A+Large, multi-channel; BBB A+.
Johnson Heating & Cooling Wentzville · Trane~791~4.8★Local Trane dealer.
Hoff Heating & A/C O’FallonYelp 224.9★Mid-size local (Angi 4.9).
Wooding Heating & Cooling Wentzville435.0★Small — Apollo’s true peer tier.
Apollo TARGET · Wentzville~424.0★Small operator — lowest rating in the set.
Source honesty Competitor counts blend Google / Birdeye / Yelp surfaces and are approximate; the defensible point is the order-of-magnitude volume gap and the star-rating gap (4.0 vs 4.8–5.0), not any single exact figure.
04 — WEBSITE & TECHNICAL

Website / Technical

DD · 4/10

The original “D” holds up. Genuine technical debt, with two real offsets. Live PageSpeed — retained from our tools.

37
Mobile perf
14.7s
Mobile LCP
32.6s
Time to interactive
0/7
Security headers
92
On-page SEO
90/94
Accessibility

No Open-Graph/Twitter tags, no H1s. Offsets: strong on-page SEO & accessibility, and a working HouseCall Pro booking portal already integrated — a real plus legacy HVAC sites usually lack.

⚑ Non-deterministic PageSpeed varies per run — the prior report read mobile perf 22, our re-run 37. Both say “bad”; treat as a range, don’t quote a single number.
05 — SEO & SEARCH

SEO / Search

unscored3/10
~3.42M
Domain rank
511
Organic keywords
~124
Monthly visits
~$768
Organic value
$0
Paid search
⚑ Data-quality flag — namespace contamination The keyword export includes “apollo home” (2,900 vol) and “apollo plumbing” (2,400) — those are other companies (Apollo Home/Cincinnati; Apollo Plumbing/Oregon). Apollo Wentzville’s true footprint is smaller than the raw count implies. Real local wins are narrow (“ac repair wentzville mo” ≈ #2). Reputation, not SEO, is carrying lead-gen.
06 — AI VISIBILITY

AI Visibility

5.9/10~5/10

Apollo surfaces in AI answers but is routinely out-surfaced by larger metro players. The metric is non-deterministic — our re-run scored 4.6 vs the report’s 5.9. Use a 4.5–6 range; don’t quote a hard number in the room.

07 — CORPORATE & OPERATIONS

Corporate & operations ✓ Confirmed

⚑ Quick credibility check Their own site publishes ZIP 63305; USPS/BBB show 63385. Minor, but mention it as a digital-hygiene finding rather than asserting one as fact.
APPENDIX A — ERRATA

Errors in the original report.

For the file · prior packet vs verified reality
Sev.Original claimVerified reality
Crit“No Google Business Profile detected.”Live GBP, ~42 reviews / 4.0★.
Crit“Zero presence on every platform / Social 1/10.”Active FB (245), Google, BBB A+, Angi 5.0.
Crit“Total greenfield.”35-yr, 2nd-gen, A+, Carrier-authorized incumbent.
CritTrusted audit_social_media / research_reputation / research_local.All three confirmed broken (systemic false negatives).
HighApollo is “#3 behind two players.”Small-tier on reviews; gap is wider; 4.0★ lowest in peer set.
MedSEO traffic figures.Inflated by other-company brand terms.
LowAI Visibility “5.9/10.”Non-deterministic; ~4.5–6 range.
APPENDIX B — BEFORE THE MEETING

Verify live · do not claim · open diligence.

If you have 10 minutes

Do NOT claim in the room

Still-open diligence (not gettable pre-meeting)

An overclaim in front of the target is worse than a hedge. Every correction here is conservative and defensible — overall confidence 86%.